Which of the following is a key factor psychologists must prove in a disciplinary proceeding regarding sexual intimacies?

In disciplinary proceedings concerning sexual intimacies between a psychologist and a client, a crucial factor that must be proven is the absence of exploitation of the client or patient. This principle is rooted in the ethical standards governing the practice of psychology, which emphasize the need for psychologists to maintain a professional and non-exploitative relationship with their clients. Engaging in sexual intimacies can create a power imbalance where the client is vulnerable; thus, demonstrating that no exploitation occurred is essential to ensure ethical and professional conduct.

Although mutual consent may appear significant in discussions about sexual relationships, it does not negate the inherent power dynamics in a therapist-client relationship. The ethical obligation for psychologists is to prioritize the welfare of the client, making exploitation a central issue in such disciplinary cases. Furthermore, while documentation of sessions and the presence of witnesses may contribute to a broader understanding of the context, they do not directly address the critical ethical issue of exploitation that lies at the heart of these relationships. Therefore, establishing that there was no exploitation is the key factor in such disciplinary proceedings.