What may happen if a psychologist fails to submit to a Board-directed examination?

When a psychologist fails to submit to a Board-directed examination, it may lead to an assumption of accountability regarding the allegations brought against them. This consequence stems from the principle of compliance in regulatory processes. The purpose of the examination is to assess the psychologist's fitness for practice and to ensure that they meet the professional standards required to protect the public.

By not complying with the directive, the psychologist essentially forfeits their opportunity to contest the allegations or defend their professional standing. The Board may interpret this non-compliance as a tacit admission that the concerns raised are valid. Moreover, such inaction can be viewed as an indication of unprofessional conduct, further impacting the psychologist’s credibility and ability to practice.

The other options suggest outcomes that may not be accurate in the context of Pennsylvania's regulations. Extensions could be granted under certain circumstances, but they are not guaranteed. Immediate license revocation typically involves more established breaches of conduct or serious offenses rather than just failing to attend an examination. Fines for non-compliance may occur, but the more direct consequence of failing to appear for a Board-directed examination is the implication of admitting to the allegations. This understanding underscores the importance of compliance in maintaining one's professional integrity and standing in the field.