In situations where ethical violations are noted, psychologists are expected to:

When psychologists encounter ethical violations, they are encouraged to attempt an informal resolution before escalating the issue to formal authorities. This approach aligns with the principles of professionalism and ethical practice, as it allows for the possibility of resolving the matter in a constructive and collegial manner. Often, individuals may not be fully aware of the impact of their actions, and addressing concerns informally can promote understanding and correction without the need for more severe measures.

By seeking informal resolution first, psychologists demonstrate a commitment to ethical standards while also respecting the relationships and dynamics that exist within their professional environment. This step underscores the importance of communication and dialogue, potentially fostering a culture of integrity and accountability within the practice or institution.

The other choices do not effectively promote the ideal of active resolution through dialogue. Ignoring the situation fails to address the ethical concern, while reporting the issue internally could escalate the conflict prematurely if informal avenues have not been fully explored. Seeking legal advice before attempting to resolve the issue can introduce unnecessary complexity and may not prioritize the ethical considerations central to the profession.