In a disciplinary action related to sexual intimacies, what type of evidence cannot be used against an individual?

In a disciplinary action concerning sexual intimacies, reputation evidence is not admissible because it may not provide objective proof of the individual's behavior relevant to the case. Reputation evidence often relies on hearsay and subjective interpretations of someone's character, which can lead to bias and unfair judgments. Legal systems prioritize concrete evidence that is directly related to the claims made, thereby safeguarding the rights of the individual being evaluated.

Professional records, witness testimonies, and client history can provide factual and reliable insights into the conduct in question, making them potentially admissible in a disciplinary context. These forms of evidence are generally more objective and can illustrate behaviors and interactions more clearly than reputation evidence, which may be influenced by personal opinions or societal perceptions.